Question by Cameron: What are ways to prevent cancer in general?
I know cancer is almost unavoidable because a lot of foods and our environment cause cancerous cells to be produced and multiply. I just want to know ways to lower my chances of getting it. Any suggestions?

Best answer:

Answer by djwmcginty
Don’t smoke
Don’t drink too much
everything in moderation.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Vicus Therapeutics Announces Initiation of Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate VT-122 in Patients with Liver Cancer Receiving …
Vicus Therapeutics, LLC, today announced the initiation of a Phase 2 trial evaluating VT-122, a novel investigational combination of etodolac and propranolol, and Nexavar® tablets, as a potential new treatment option for patients with advanced liver cancer , systemic inflammation and cachexia. Â
Read more on PR Newswire via Yahoo! Finance

Rob Long will talk publicly Tuesday; first time since cancer cells found
Syracuse (WSYR-TV) – Syracuse Orange senior punter Rob Long will talk publicly for the first time since doctors found cancerous cells in a tumor removed from his brain. Long will miss the Pinstripe Bowl because of cancer treatment, but he will take part in a news conference with his teammates on Tuesday in New York City. The surgery to remove the tumor took place on December 14th.  Malignant …
Read more on WSYR 9 Syracuse

Question by Liz C: What’s the difference between Cancer Cells and having Cancer?
I just had a biopsy and was told I have cancerous cells in my breast. Is that Breast Cancer?

Best answer:

Answer by kingyuzamule
pre-cancer, probably.

cancer is the uncontrollable division of cells. get it checked out -immediately-. there IS NO HESITATION.

not to scare you, but if you don’t wanna end up with one boob, do something about it!

Give your answer to this question below!

Reader’s Question:
A virus is foreign RNA enters the body and actually becomes part of the cell’s DNA. Cancer is caused when the DNA of a cell becomes mutated one way or another and the cell will divide and replicate uncontrollably. Both “virused” and cancerous cells are cells with mutations in the DNA. To me, virus is just RNA that causes mutation from the outside whereas cancer is mutations that come from within. Where is the real difference between these two mutations, if not in potency and ability to damage the body?

I had to post this item on lung cancer. Keeping this blog current naturally means constantly looking for videos, news and other useful content which aids people to have more data on cancer. Be sure to look closely at it all. Don’t forget to offer your opinions so the rest of us can appreciate your thoughts:

Want a Natural Health approach to Cancer Treatment?

See More…

—————–

A Look Toward the Final Stage of Lung Cancer

In its early stages, lung cancer can be treated through surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Depending on the extent to which the disease has metastasized, a surgeon may be able to remove the cancerous tissue by performing a wedge resection, lobectomy, or pneumonectomy. By the time lung cancer has reached stage 4, a combination of all three approaches is necessary and even then, may be unsuccessful.

If the diseased cells cannot be eliminated through treatment, they will eventually spread throughout the body to the point where recovery is all but impossible. Death becomes imminent. In this article, we’ll describe what patients can expect to experience during the final stage of lung cancer.

Changes In Body

In nearly 30% of terminal cases, the patient will experience malignant pleural effusion. This occurs when fluid begins to fill the space that surrounds the lungs. It will result in breathing difficulties, which can be reduced by draining the space of fluid.

Other common physical changes in the last stage of lung cancer include bleeding and pain throughout the bones. Bleeding can result when the diseased cells create an impediment in the patient’s airway. In the case of bone pain, cancerous cells can spread into the patient’s spine and chest. The pain can be controlled with medications.

In the final-stage, the disease can spread into the brain. If this happens, the patient may experience seizures and severe headaches. Depending on the area of the brain that is affected, speech problems can also occur.

As the patient nears the end, he or she will lose a significant amount of weight. This typically happens even when the person’s caloric intake remains steady.

Changes In Mind

When a person who is suffering from terminal lung cancer enters the last few months of their life, they will often start to withdraw from their loved ones. This is partly due to physical and mental fatigue as the disease progresses. It may also be due to the person contemplating the end as it approaches. It is important to have a network of support during these last months.

Preparing For The End

During the last few days, the person’s body will undergo a “settling down” process as it prepares itself for death. The skin’s temperature will decline and even take on a bluish hue in spots. The patient’s breathing pattern will alternate between deep and shallow breaths. Eventually, the fluids that have accumulated in the throat will cause gurgling.

It is also possible that the person suffering from final-stage lung cancer will suddenly seem energetic. He or she may sit up in their bed and appear mentally alert. This is not a sign of recovery.

Watching a loved one go through the final days of terminal lung cancer can be heartbreaking. Once the disease has metastasized outside the lung tissue, it spreads quickly. If you are diagnosed with lung cancer, it is vital that you receive treatment as soon as possible. Ask your physician whether minimally invasive lung cancer surgery is an option.

Find the right doctor for lung cancer treatments or mitral valve repair. Early diagnosis can lead to successful results.

The University of Colorado Hospital has recently embarked on what news reports have deemed a "groundbreaking medical trial" for patients suffering from pancreatic cancer. The trial uses a new technique designed to "shrink the tumor with very concentrated, very localized medication," according to 7 Denver News, a local television news casting station.

Physicians have been using a combination of the drug known as Tumor Necrosis Factor along with Imaged Guided Radiation Therapy technology. The therapy works in two phases, with the first phase administered each week as "doctors use an endoscope through the mouth to the stomach to deliver the drug and inject it directly into the tumor," reported 7 Denver News. In the second phase, the tumor, which is now drug-filled, is subject to a daily blast of radiation, which attempts to stimulate the drug until the tumor begins to break down.

While the trial continues to be conducted, physicians with the study have already noted that, "patients with the standard treatment survive about eight-and-a-half months and that patients with this new treatment live about eleven-and-a-half months."

Pancreatic Cancer Signs and Symptoms

Pancreatic cancer occurs when cancerous cells "begin in the ducts of the pancreas, but they sometimes develop from the cells of that make the pancreatic enzymes," according to the American Cancer Society (ACS). The Mayo Clinic also explained that there are several signs and symptoms of the pancreatic cancer including the following:

* loss of appetite

* depression

* weight loss

* yellowing of the skin

* yellowing of the whites of the eyes

* upper abdominal pain

There are a number of reasons that pancreatic cancer can occur, however, one of the most recent risks is that of Byetta consumption. Byetta is a type 2 diabetes drug that is prescribed to patients as an injectable form of insulin to regulate glucose levels in individuals. The drug was released in 2005 from Amylin Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly and Company. Recently, the drug was linked to the onset of pancreatitis, which can develop into pancreatic cancer if left untreated.

In 2008, approximately six patients were hospitalized for their Byetta-induced side effects of acute pancreatitis. Of the six patients, two resulted in fatality. Patients who have experienced the Byetta dangers are advised to discuss their case with a pharmaceutical attorney who can offer a free legal consultation as to the development of a Byetta class action lawsuit, which may result in the reward of monetary funds for a Byetta patient. By contacting a professional attorney an individual increases the protection of themselves and their family members.

LegalView (http://www.LegalView.info ) offers an array of information ranging from mesothelioma treatments to Avandia risks and Byetta dangers (http://byetta.legalview.info).

Article Source: ArticleSpan

After a diagnosis of cancer there are generally two paths open to people. They can undergo an orthodox medical treatment program for the cancer or they can look at alternative treatments for cancer. A third option involves doing nothing and hoping things sort themselves out. So which is best?

Unfortunately it is practically impossible to say because there is no absolute research into this. The reason that there is no research is because medical professionals are not allowed to prescribe alternative treatments. The result is that in almost all cases a patient who is diagnosed with cancer undergoes an orthodox treatment program including chemotherapy, surgery and radiation. Very few choose to either do nothing or to pursue alternative treatment options.

The reasons that people tend to go the orthodox medical route are varied and complex, but if we want to simplify things as much as possible they boil down to this: Chemotherapy and Orthodox medication are the treatment of choice of those seen as ‘experts’ on cancer, the doctors, and it is doctors who will usually diagnose cancer. In other words, the choice is a bogus one and a combination of chemotherapy, surgery and radiation are usually presented as the only options there are.

But suppose you were to be told that there is an alternative to this trio of invasive medication. Suppose it had no side effects. Suppose it not only helped your cancer but also greatly improved your general health overall and suppose it wasn’t going to cost you over quarter of a million dollars(The US department of commerce reported that a cancer patients treatment will cost over $375,000).

The alternative does actually exist, and it remarkably simple. Where chemotherapy destroys the immune system, alternative treatment enhances it. Where radiation kills cells indiscriminately alternative medication only targets cancerous cells. Where surgery can often aid in the spread of cancer alternative therapy helps your body to use it’s naturally defenses to suppress that spread. The ‘cure’ is nothing new, it is merely hidden from the public as a viable option, or ridiculed as ‘quakery’. Perhaps most surprising of all is that it has been supported by some very reputable names who have put their reputation and careers on the line to get word of it to the public, and without fail that is exactly what they have lost.

When a doctor makes a diagnosis of cancer he will also usually include a prescribed course of action. This usually consists of 3 parts. First they will attempt a surgical removal of the cancer tumor, secondly chemotherapy and radiation will be used to kill the cancer cells. Alternative medicine will usually start with building up the immune system and cleansing the body of toxins. Which is better?

The statistics take a little wading through, but it has been suggested that around 45% of people will achieve a 5-year cure from cancer by following orthodox treatment methods. This is a misleading statistic – it is a 5 year cure not a total cure. Alternative medicine tends not to measure 5 year cures but rather total cure rate. Orthodox medicine does not release total cure rates though it has been suggested that their cure rate is around 3%. Of those who attempt orthodox treatment and, when told there is nothing more orthodox medicine can do for them ( or that they can afford to pay for) attempt alternative medication the total cure rate could be as high as 50%. Of those who seek alternative treatment instead of any orthodox treatment the likely total cure rate is close to 90%.

So if we have a 90% cure rate from alternative medicine and a 3% cure rate from orthodox medicine, why does the alternative approach not become the standard one. The answer is a little cloudy and is based on those numbers being very hard to prove. Orthodox medicine does not compare itself with alternative medicine and so the only official numbers we see are the increase in effectiveness of their own treatments. So to help you with your decision let’s examine what danger cancer presents and how it is dealt with.

The first thing that is probably not explained to you is that a cancer tumor usually is not fatal. A cancer can be benign or malignant, and only if it is malignant does it pose a serious threat(note that a benign tumor that places pressure on a major organ or blocks an artery is dangerous by itself – but not because of the cancer). Thus it is not the cancer that is dangerous to our health, but the spread of the cancer.

Alternative medication looks at the cause of this cancerous growth which is usually the combination of a weakened immunity system and a carcinogen. The alternative therapy will then seek to address this problem and destroy the atmosphere which leads to the cancer. The increased immune system, combined with fresh delivery of oxygen prevents the cancer from spreading and eventually starves it to death. The beauty is that this process targets only foreign cells, killing off the cancer but not harming (and usually benefiting) the healthy cells.

Orthodox medicine treats the tumor very differently. The tumor is very much the focal point of attack. It is treated as the problem when in fact it is merely a symptom of the problem. Often surgery is the first method of dealing with this problem and while this can remove the tumor it can also release cancer cells into the bloodstream. Remember that it is the spread of cancer that can be fatal, not the cancer itself. Surgery may very well contribute to that spread.

Secondly radiation treats cancer by killing off the cancer cells, but it does so indiscriminately and kills many healthy cells at the same time. Chemotherapy drugs also seek to reduce the size of the tumor and break down the cancer cells, but in doing so they can damage healthy cells and decimate the immune system. Chemotherapy drugs must be administered gradually. The reason for this is that is given all at once they would destroy too many healthy cells and probably kill the patient. The body must be given time to recover between chemotherapy sessions. For some reason it is assumed the cancer will not also recover in that time, when it will most likely spread as a result of damaged adjoining cells and a crippled immunity system.

The biggest frustration for the advancement of alternative cancer treatments is not providing evidence that alternative treatments work, but getting that proof recognized. Registered doctors are not permitted to practice alternative treatment if they wish to remain a member of the AMA, and experiments outside the AMA are usually rubbished as not being performed by real medical professionals. In 1976 when a ‘real medical professional’, two time Nobel prize winner Linus Pauling, took his experiments outside the country he was able to show in his Scottish study that a cancer patients life expectancy could be extended by 600% by merely administering 10 grams of vitamin C intravenously. Vitamin C is well know for it’s ability to build up the human immune system.

30 years ago this research by a Nobel Prize winner proved that natural treatment can greatly improve the life expectancy of a cancer sufferer. Natural treatment advocates have been able to refine that research to provide even more efficient vitamin C treatments, but mainstream medicine has not even replicated the study.

While the evidence is blurred, lied about, hidden and in same cases destroyed, it seems clear that there is plenty of merit in pursuing further investigation of alternative cancer therapies. There is at enough examples of successful treatment using alternative medicines that it cannot simply be dismissed out of hand as ‘quackery’ as has been the official line. There are plenty of examples of medical practitioners who have set out to prove alternative natural treatments wrong and have subsequently changed their opinion to support it. Alternative therapy is at least an adequate alternative for orthodox medicine and most likely a very suitable replacement.

Mark Branyon collaborates with international experts in continually improving existing protocols. Their treatment strategy incorporates the best modalities of both worlds mainstream and alternative according to individual needs. http://www.newhopemedicalcenter.com

Article Source: ArticleSpan

While there’s a whole gamut of cancer treatment options available; which is the best one to use depends upon the type of cancer as well the stage that the cancer has reached. Though the prevailing trend is to resort to more traditional cancer treatment options, cancer patients are not restricted to them. There are a variety of alternative and natural options (some new, some old) for treating cancer.

Traditional Cancer Treatment Options

Traditional cancer treatment options are often referred to as cut, poison and burn (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation).

Chemotherapy

Chemotherapy, which involves the use of chemical agents or drugs to destroy cancerous cells, forms the core treatment of malignancies. These drugs work by targeting fast-growing cells and the type and combination of drugs depends upon the type of cancer. Though chemotherapy has been proven to be effective, it can give rise to a host of side-effects including hair loss, fatigue, diarrhea, loss of appetite, anemia or low red blood cell count, neutropenia or low white blood cell count, mouth sores and shortness of breath.

Radiation Therapy

Radiation therapy involves the use of high-energy ionizing radiation from varied sources including x-rays, gamma rays, protons and neutrons to shrink tumors and kill cancerous cells. It is used almost half of all cancer patients; either by itself or in combination with other cancer treatments. External-beam radiation therapy, which involves using radiation that is emitted from a machine outside the body is more common than internal radiation therapy, in which a radioactive material is implanted in the body near the tumor or cancer cells.

Surgery

Surgery often entails a biopsy, which is done for diagnostic purposes. Surgery that is done to remove the cancerous tissues is often followed by chemotherapy or radiotherapy, which reduces the risk of the cancer recurring and also to destroy any cancer cells that may be left behind in the affected part of the body.

The kind of surgery depends on which part of the body has been affected by cancer as well as the extent of the cancer. In breast cancer patients the options could include lumpectomy, in which only the lump is removed; segmentectomy, in which part of the breast is removed or mastectomy, in which the entire breast is removed.

Learn about Alternative Cancer Treatment options at http://www.redfruitoil.com/

Article Source: ArticleSpan

For more extensive information on Herbal and Natural Treatments and Remedies go to:

Herbal and Natural Cancer Treatments

Is there such a thing as a cancer cure. Most intelligent people trained in cancer research and treatment would conclusively and convincingly answer that question with a resounding “no!”

Are they right or just parroting what has been widely disseminated in the mainstream media and medical journals. Based on the available results and the consistently high rates of death due to all types of cancer they could hardly be wrong. It would stand to reason that if a true cancer cure, whether mainstream or alternative, had been found the currently high rate of death due to cancer would have gone down significantly.

What if researchers had found a seriously viable treatment protocol that was shown to be very effective at treating cancer if not outright leading to a cancer cure? What if that treatment protocol was so simple and straightforward that anybody could implement it? What if based on the ease of implementation, low cost and therefore the lack of profit to be made, would mainstream science and pharmaceutical companies be inclined to promote its widespread adoption and to aggressively market its use to frontline physicians.

Unfortunately, it seems as if the cure for cancer has evolved into a cancer cure that can be marketing and sold at a tremendous profit to the end user, which in this case is the cancer victim or their insurance carrier if they are fortunate enough to have health insurance.

Is it hard to believe that after the billions of dollars invested in cancer research we don’t seem to be any closer to a true cancer cure. Could it be that we may have the cure for cancer sitting under our collective noses but those companies with the resources to advance and promote it have no financial incentive to do so?

We have made great strides in finding new and novel ways to attack cancerous cells. But the question to be asked is “has a cancer cure been found?” The answer to that question could be a resounding “yes!” But in the absence of a formal clinical study funded by an entity with sufficiently deep pockets to do so, we may continue to be stuck and bombarded by the same old staples of chemo, radiation and surgery.

Are there promising treatments that have been FDA approved and in development? Sure! The only problem is that with the sky rocketing cost of healthcare how many of us will actually be able to benefit from these new therapies without having to fall into bankruptcy or significant debt. All the while hoping that the new fangled therapies would indeed save our life.

There just might be a tried and true cancer cure that could work for the majority of us. The only question being, can we find out what cancer researchers already know but have no financial incentive to share with us or the larger medical community. As always, we just don’t know what we don’t know and as it relates to cancer that ignorance could be fatal!

My mother died from cancer when I was 16. During a medical exam, my doctor saw something suspicious on my X-ray and since I was a smoker, and therefore at an increased risk for cancer, sent me for a CAT scan. Knowing that I could have cancer forced me to find a legitimate alternative cancer treatment. I have since written a book to share this information. You can visit my website http://www.howtostopcancer.com to learn more.

Article Source: ArticleSpan

For Information On Herbal and Natural Treatments Go To:

Herbal and Natural Remedies